case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-03-17 03:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #4455 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4455 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Umbrella Academy]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Doom Patrol, Crazy Jane]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Deathclaw Desu Ga!]


__________________________________________________



05.
[James Bond, "Goldeneye"]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Umbrella Academy]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Umbrella Academy]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #638.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is being against the male gaze sex negative?

(Anonymous) 2019-03-18 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Sexual attraction, to me at least, is romanticizing aspects of a person because you want to bang them. Objectification is the extreme form of this, but all sexual attraction has an element of it. There's other components to a healthy relationship and relationship based solely on sexual attraction is not a healthy one.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: Is being against the male gaze sex negative?

[personal profile] tabaqui 2019-03-18 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
It's a healthy one if all you both want is sex.

Re: Is being against the male gaze sex negative?

(Anonymous) 2019-03-18 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Fair, I should have left a caveat for fuckbuddies and one night stands.