[ SECRET POST #4459 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4459 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Dan Bern, WTNV, I Only Listen To the Mountain Goats, the Mountain Goats]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Director James Gunn, Guardians of the Galaxy franchise]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #638.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well, employers are obviously going to do whatever suits their bottom line. But I don't think outraged twitter mobs make the best judge and jury.

[(Anonymous)]

"people on Twitter should not decide who gets fired" is a totally different idea than "people shouldn't get fired for Tweets"! I agree that you shouldn't just be fired for having a tweet that's, like, controversial. But I think there are tweets that really are bad that one could deserve to get fired for, depending on the context.

And then, like you say, ultimately companies are going to do what they want to.

[(Anonymous)]

Who is deciding what's "controversial" and what's a terminable tweet?

Who is deciding the context?

[(Anonymous)]

There's no objective standard for any of those things. Nor could there be. You have to use the best judgment you can.

But that's not unique to Twitter, that's the way that almost anything works.

[(Anonymous)]

probably the employer?


what kinda question is that