[ SECRET POST #4460 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4460 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Ready Player One]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Umbrella Academy, Sir Reginald Hargreeves/Mom]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Umbrella Academy, Five]


__________________________________________________
























06. [SPOILERS for Isn't It Romantic]
[WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of domestic violence]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #638.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Wasn't this so-called "evidence" just the misconstruing of a Twitter account who had repeatedly stanned Depp and if you watch the actual court proceedings, then she wasn't actually abusive (and the ex she supposedly abused even AGREED she wasn't and that report was a hell of a lot more complicated than it first seemed)?

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly.

THE "EVIDENCE" CAME FROM A DEPP STAN.

I stg.

[(Anonymous)]

And from the statement his lawyer submitted to court, which isn't /fact/, just his side of the argument. None of it, his side or Amber's, has actually gone to court/been verified for public knowledge.

[(Anonymous)]

One of the things that gets me is that part of the purported evidence for Depp is that he possibly had relationships with 8 women and none of them came forward with any allegations, so obviously Heard is lying. Except so many of those relationships were brief and/or so long ago that a) it's likely that if one of the women had been abused she might not have been comfortable coming forward (see the me too movement now) and b) Depp's alcohol and substance abuse has seemingly gotten worse, and people often act badly under the influence, so that could be a factor.

I'm reserving judgment as to Depp's side of the allegations until there is actual proof. Like Heard's photo, restraining order, and judgment win. At the very least I think it was a mutually abusive relationship, and I have no idea why people are so quick to jump on "obviously Depp is totally innocent of everything!"

[(Anonymous)]

I have no idea why people are so quick to jump on "obviously Depp is totally innocent of everything!"

Well, plenty are doing the opposite too. "Obviously Heard is totally innocent of everything!"

But for discussion's sake, I think it's combination of the knee-jerk reaction, and black-or-white thinking. If one is innocent, the other must be guilty, and vice versa. When it comes to things like abuse, I think people are afraid of the gray areas. Like maybe they think considering any of the in-between will somehow diminish everything that abuse is, or take away from victims and the trauma they experience, or paint all victims in a certain light. Maybe a fear of society going back to the "well, he/she was asking for it" garbage that justifies no abusive behavior.