[ SECRET POST #4462 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"But, I mean, why does Dumbledore's sexuality have to be important in the first place? It's not really relevant to the plot. For the record I'm okay with gay characters, but it feels ingenuine most of the time and just like needless pandering. Why do you gotta make someone's sexuality their defining trait? If you want to normalize people being gay then don't call attention to it, etc, etc." UUUUUGH.

So, yeah, I completely I agree with you, anon. I'm so sick of every excuse being made why they can be explicitly gay in the author's headcanon but their relationship can't even be defined in the movies. "More than brothers..." Why can't you just call them lovers?? You would never call a straight pairing 'more than siblings.'

[(Anonymous)]

Countdown for someone to blame the Chinese in 3, 2, 1

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, this one is on the Christian fundamentalists who staged literal book burnings when it was just a kids' series about magic school.