[ SECRET POST #4462 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I don't care about Rowling's post canon comments, but.....

[(Anonymous)]

To me, I would say that subtext is implicit in the text. So there's a specific pattern of codes or signs that underlines the thing in a way that's not explicitly mentioned but is undeniably present.

Whereas with Dumbledore and all, there's nothing that's really implicit. There's things that can be read a certain way, but it's equally plausible to read them as being nothing at all. Subtext is still part of the text, to me.

That's the line that I draw / where I'm kinda coming from.

Re: I don't care about Rowling's post canon comments, but.....

[(Anonymous)]

it's equally plausible to read them as being nothing at all.

If Dumbledore's relationship with a woman was described the same way it was described with Grindelwald, nobody would be questioning it.

Re: I don't care about Rowling's post canon comments, but.....

[(Anonymous)]

If you honestly think there was nothing implicit in the text, you're either very young or very sheltered.

Re: I don't care about Rowling's post canon comments, but.....

[(Anonymous)]

I understand what was in the text, and I understood at it the time. I don't think that "implicit" is the right word to describe it.