[ SECRET POST #4462 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Do you think SJW is useful as a term?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think SJW is a useful term to capture that dynamic, though, because its use is not at all limited to those contexts. Most of the time it's used by people who think that's an accurate description of everyone who cares about social justice at all.

Re: Do you think SJW is useful as a term?

[(Anonymous)]

What would you propose as a better term? It works fine with the sj-postive social circles I'm in.

Re: Do you think SJW is useful as a term?

[(Anonymous)]

"Extremists"? "Dickheads"? I don't know! I agree it's a problem but I don't think 'SJW' is the answer to it.

Re: Do you think SJW is useful as a term?

[(Anonymous)]

Eh, both too vague for me. Until another term pops up that describes "social justice activist, but bad" as well as sjw, I'm gonna use it in circumstances where it works, sorry.