case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-03-24 03:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #4462 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-03-24 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
From the secret, I think OP interprets Nat as saying "I believed not having kids meant it was okay to do bad things, but now I feel that belief was very wrong and I think believing that made me a monster." It's still hard to see how the connection was made between no kids and doing bad things, though. It's considered a thing that you would want to make the world a better place for your children, but that doesn't translate to wanting to actively make the world a shittier place if you don't have kids. I could imagine someone saying they didn't care about climate change because they weren't leaving descendants to live with it, but it's a big leap to "Assassination is OK."

Besides, if she was raised to believe her missions were for the greater good, I don't see how there would have been a connection between not having kids and doing bad things. She would have thought what she did would benefit children.