case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-03-24 03:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #4462 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: (secret maker)

(Anonymous) 2019-03-24 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Then we might as well go back to old Tar Season Anon, because hey, it's content, right? I mean, there's no discussion to be had, because it has no connection to anything in any actual canon anywhere, but as long as someone is making posts about something...

Wait, what was the point of this community again?

Re: (secret maker)

(Anonymous) 2019-03-25 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
But all of your problems with the secret would be exactly the same if the person who had made the original comment had made it as a secret instead of a comment

Re: (secret maker)

(Anonymous) 2019-03-25 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Nayrt but +1 and looks like there's plenty of discussion on this secret.

Re: (secret maker)

(Anonymous) 2019-03-25 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
You think the person who made the original comment also had absolutely no idea why they held that opinion? You don't think very highly of them, do you?

Re: (secret maker)

(Anonymous) 2019-03-25 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
Secrets don't have to generate discussion. They also don't have to fit with your arbitrary standards of how connected to canon it is. I note that none of your objections apply to THIS secret, which is very connected to canon and has generated discussion.

Wait, what was the point of your objection again?