[ SECRET POST #4464 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4464 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"Characterisation I like" =/= "in character/good characterisation" though. I don't even mind most of Luke's development and characterisation (though I think it had its issues, especially in some scene that should have been killed with fire) but just because you like something doesn't mean it's great and without fault.

[(Anonymous)]

No shit?? people ITT are just pointing out it's a matter of opinion and not some absolute fact that Luke was "ooc". As someone else said, people are allowed to disagree with you.

[(Anonymous)]

You can certainly make an argument that it's bad characterization but the idea that it's fundamentally unrealistic because aging doesn't change people that much is not a good argument.