Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-04-17 07:15 pm
[ SECRET POST #4485 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4485 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Rookie]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Good Omens]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Jonathan Van Ness (Queer Eye) and ex-boyfriend Wilco Froneman]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Pennyworth]
__________________________________________________
06.

[The IT Crowd]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Rise of the Guardians and Carmen Sandiego]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #642.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...
(Anonymous) 2019-04-18 12:33 am (UTC)(link)I think it's fine to use this as a starting point to raise awareness about other historical and cultural significant landmarks that have been lost, and pledge ourselves to actively protecting them. It's also fine to point out the wealth inequality of billionaires pledging their chump change to restore Notre Dame, or criticize the Vatican's unwillingness to help. It's fine to point out that it could be hard to spend hundreds of millions of dollars restoring a building when money needs to go to other causes as well.
But it's a good thing that people feel an emotional connection to this building. We should not be simplifying this to some dichotomy of "if you donate to a building instead of the homeless, you suck." It's good that people care about Notre Dame - that passion will hopefully lead to it being restored, and increase awareness about precious historical landmarks, including ones that don't get as much attention.