[ SECRET POST #4485 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4485 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Rookie]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jonathan Van Ness (Queer Eye) and ex-boyfriend Wilco Froneman]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Pennyworth]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The IT Crowd]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Rise of the Guardians and Carmen Sandiego]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #642.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

For governments, sure. But individuals can do what they want and they shouldn't be shat on for choosing to give their money to one cause over another. Charity of any sort should be encouraged.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, while charity is good, Notre Dame is set. More money won't help the situation. Thoughtful charity is better than feel good charity.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

... you do realize that things like cathedrals cost an enormous amount of money to keep up, right? it's not like it's no longer going to need any money once the reconstruction is done.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

Unless it somehow stops being one of the greatest cultural sites of Christianity, it'll get the money the money to maintain it and plenty more.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

Was it hurting for funds before the fire then?

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT Sorta. The cathedral was undergoing repairs before the fire and they were having trouble raising money for it.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

I heard they were having trouble raising money for the conservation/repair efforts that may have accidentally started the fire, so maybe?

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

It was physically crumbling and no one was swooping in to donate hundreds of millions to fix the problem.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think you can necessarily treat the amount of money (and hence power) that some people have as a morally neutral thing. And I think once you do have people with that level of power and money, there are some choices they can make that are just so disportionate and useless, compared to the opportunity cost of what else could be done with the money, that I do think you can be critical of it.