[ SECRET POST #4485 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4485 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Rookie]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jonathan Van Ness (Queer Eye) and ex-boyfriend Wilco Froneman]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Pennyworth]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The IT Crowd]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Rise of the Guardians and Carmen Sandiego]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #642.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[morieris]

Funny how you want to play "hur dur I hate social justice but I have no links to share." and coincidentally had nothing to say about the black churches.

https://www.mlive.com/news/flint/2019/04/roughly-2500-lead-service-lines-left-to-replace-in-flint.html

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/trump-misleads-on-aid-to-puerto-rico/ -> allocated isn't distributed.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-accuse-rick-scott-of-siding-with-trump-to-block-disaster-aid-for-puerto-rico/?intcid=CNI-00-10aaa3b

Frankly, you're nothing but a contrarian pain in the ass and this was a better community when you weren't here, and I wish my ban of you from my journal actually went to you not being able to reply to me in any capacity.

Re: Notre Dame backlash...

[ill_omened]

I didn't feel the need for links, given what I said was objectively true, and the links posted by you don't do anything to undermine what I said. Yes major infrastructure projects take time (which I why all the piping has yet to be replaced), and your links didn't touch on the ineffective nature of the distribution of aid provided to Puerto Rico on a local level. Which whether it's a measly ten billion, or the forty plus billion to come is irrelevant if it's not being effectively used.

And the question of the black churches doesn't really dignify an answer. The government has investigated and successfully prosecuted the assailant, and the churches should be suitably covered, or are covered by the local community. What the churches are not, are priceless international treasures three times older than your entire country.

You're also falling into the trap of claiming that no money can be donated internationally until every single problem in the US has been solved. Which means, you are saying that no money should ever be given internationally because that will not happen.

p.s. It's okay, I neither have the slightest interest in posting on your journal or will remember your name long enough to be bothered to post on it sunshine.