[ SECRET POST #4495 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4495 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #644.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

Scale. Nitpicking is a type of criticism, but a very superficial one. Nitpicks are done because you enjoy complaining where as (good) criticism is usually done out of desire to see improvement. This usually reflected in how substantial it is, since nitpicks are a bunch of minor unrelated things where as good crit tackles a persistent issue.

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

So you think that people who criticize Ariana Grande are only doing so because they like complaining, and also that they wouldn't complain about her if she was was a man?

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

People would still complain, but it'd be nowhere near as intense or persistent if she were a man. Additionally, most of it has to do with her appearance, which automatically would be de-emphasized.

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

But the question still has to be whether the criticism is legitimate or not. Sure, she wouldn't be criticized as much if she was a man, because we let male celebrities get away with insane amounts of bullshit. Chris Brown still has a career, etc. But that doesn't mean that the criticism is illegitimate, or that it wouldn't be worth making if she was a man.

And I don't think the criticism is nitpicking, I think it's substantive, or at least there's substance present. I think it's pretty chickenshit to act like your work is beyond criticism, for one thing.

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

Then why all focus on her, when there's much more terrible people in the industry? Is it because she's less threatening and more accessible than the Chris Browns and Roman Polanskis of entertainment?

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

Again, I don't think that makes the criticism wrong

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions

[(Anonymous)]

I guess, that's where we differ, because I think most of the criticism towards is so nitpicky, it's not worth bringing up, despite some truth.