case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-02 10:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #4500 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4500 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Neil Gaiman's Good Omens and American Gods]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Exist Archive: The Other Side of the Sky]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Letterkenny]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Umbrella Academy]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #644.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-03 09:45 am (UTC)(link)
But the military helping fund movies and providing both access, people, and equipment in return for positive portrayals has been part of Hollywood for literally decades? They're also involved in tv shows.

Captain Marvel being sponsored is not a new trend that only Disney has been open to. It's not even like the first MCU movie that had military involvement.

(Wings, released back in 1927 and backed by the Pentagon is considered one of the earliest big project.)

https://www.thoughtco.com/pentagon-support-for-war-films-3438458

This has been an issue that has rightfully been discussed over the decades.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-03 10:50 am (UTC)(link)
Most people in fandom only care when it's a movie they don't like. "This movie was funded by the military so it's bad" is a "gotcha" to people who liked the movie, not a real criticism of the fact that it happens.