case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-13 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #4511 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4511 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #646.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-13 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
DA but one of them is not a woman, and there is no actual queer representation in this series.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-14 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
But if people would be agreeing it were a canon relationship if it were straight, then wouldn't it be just as much queer representation if it's queer?

(Anonymous) 2019-05-14 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
No, because gay relationships don't have the body of text that make subtext like that useful. Gay relationships have ALWAYS only been subtext, not actual canon. This is a canon relationship that has every reason to NOT be subtext and yet here it still is being kept on the DL. It's not the same at all.