[ SECRET POST #4512 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4512 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #646.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The things you implied were: it's okay for her to mislead people into wasting money on useless health fads because those people may be rich, and Hollywood standards are lower so we should judge her by those, not ones for normal people

Or was that not what you meant?

[(Anonymous)]

I do think that the standards by which we judge things should differ based on the circumstances and sometimes that includes things like who the victims are, yes. I think that's true in general, from a moral point of view.

With regard to Hollywood, I'm not thinking of general moral standards there, so much as the relationship between art and artists. Hollywood is full of morally bankrupt people, and when you're trying to navigate the relationship between Hollywood and the movies that Hollywood produces, the reality is that a huge amount of Hollywood movies involve people who are morally much worse than Paltrow.