case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-15 06:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #4513 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4513 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #646.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-05-16 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
What do you mean? That's literally what they said?

(Anonymous) 2019-05-16 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
da
IMO Russos didn't express it clearly enough in the movies, at least that's my take on it.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-05-16 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
Oh I completely agree. I also don't actually agree that Thor was in any way to blame. I'm not sure he was aiming at any part of Thanos in particular so much as just generally aiming at Thanos. I'm just saying that's what the directors think.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-16 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
NA - Yeah, that's largely how I feel about it. I do care about authorial intent, but I don't ascribe to the notion that a creator can simply state, extratextually, that something is canon, and that makes it so.

If the text is ambiguous, then the text is ambiguous.