case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-18 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #4516 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4516 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Secret Etiquette Of Lady Takashima]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Avatar: The Last Airbender]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Stephen Fry as Inspector Thompson in Gosford Park]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Dragon Age/Dragon Age: Origins/DA4]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Queer Eye, S03 E01 "From Hunter to Huntee"]


__________________________________________________



09.
[A View to a Kill]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 58 secrets from Secret Submission Post #647.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Ships You Can't Admit To

(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I can understand it being controversial if Sansa were 13 (which it sounds like she is in the books?) but if she's an adult in show canon, and that's the age one ships her at, then it really doesn't seem like much of a controversy.

Not that I'm in favor of viciously sending people hate because they ship a fictional 13-year-old with a fictional adult. But I can definitely see why that would be controversial and a big squick for a lot of people. Whereas getting all moralistic and anti about a pairing because, "OMG she was way underage when they met eight years ago!" just seems a bit absurd to me.