case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-19 02:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #4517 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4517 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #647.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-20 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Or, you know, any of the movies could have a single passing mention to the man who raised Peter actually having existed instead of a mere implication that's really only there if you squint really hard. Even a picture of Ben somewhere in the apartment. A passing mention that May is extra worried because it's just the two of them now. Literally anything.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-20 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
It was subtle, for sure, but I don't think it was ambiguous. Personally, I much prefer it the way they've done it. I like that the writers allow us to infer a lot about Peter's backstory. I like that they're committed to finding a new angle so that it's not just rehashing the same story beats one more time.