case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-23 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4521 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4521 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Nine Lives Man]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Citizen Kane]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #647.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2019-05-24 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
They're both concerned about sex and morality, sure, that's true as a general statement, but the actual nature of those concerns - and the moral framework underpinning them - are totally different.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2019-05-24 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Sure, but the effect is the same. Victorian censorship was motivated by a) over-emphasized terror of sex as a uniquely life-ruining force, and b)a belief that all fiction should teach clear, simple, and obvious moral lessons, lest the ~vulnerable be ~misled.

Most of the purity wank I see on Twitter and Tumblr these days has exactly the same motivations.