case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-26 03:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #4524 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4524 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #648.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)

[personal profile] tree_and_leaf 2019-05-28 11:59 am (UTC)(link)
In the Middle Ages, it was not uncommon, where members of the nobility were married as children or barely-teenagers, for several years to pass before they slept together. Even if mediaeval people didn't share our ideas about consent and when adults were adults, they weren't stupid and had noticed that thirteen year olds having babies often ended badly. As indeed it did for Margaret - while she and the baby both survived, the birth was very difficult, and she had no further children in either of her two other marriages, apparently because she'd been left infertile by the injuries she sustained. (She had actually been married twice by the age of thirteen, although her first marriage was annulled and she never regarded John de la Pole, the boy she was first married to, as her husband. There's no evidence the marriage was anything more than nominal).

There were specific reasons why Edmund Tudor desperately wanted an heir by Margaret as quickly as possible - it wasn't the norm. Although, of course, it also wasn't considered *completely* unacceptable.