case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-27 06:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #4525 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4525 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #648.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) 2019-05-28 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
I agree on the different levels of comfort thing. I've given up on the project of reinterpreting straight characters through ship goggles and calling it representation or queerbaiting, depending on one's perspective. LGBTQ-friendly work has really exploded over the last decade, so I'd much rather read that than yet another argument that I should give Supernatural or Fantastic Beasts a go for its subtext.

I'm bi, and unfortunately have had bad relationships with straight women who bragged about liking slash and gay culture. I'm generally not inclined to trust that public shipping translates into private support when it really matters.

But, you're right that "discourse" is an energy sink, so I'm not inclined to scour the web for stuff I find sketchy and issue "callouts." I'd rather read great work from supportive publishers than rant about a person's fanwork.