[ SECRET POST #4535 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4535 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #649.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I sort of agree? And I actually like flowery writing most of the time, but it seems like a lot of writers don't have the touch for it, and it often seems very ersatz - like it's based on a very narrow received idea of what Victorian style should be like.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

[(Anonymous)]

This. It's a little more flowery than contemporary language, but some authors think that means super run on sentences or just plain incomprehensible writing.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, and that's another thing - writing sentences with the length, complexity and structure often employed by the Victorians, and doing so effectively, requires a grammatical rigor and precision that's unaccustomed now.

Not saying that's a good or bad thing, particularly, just the style of the times.

[(Anonymous)]

IA. I don't think many people grasp that, and their efforts are just...long sentences with shaky verb conjugation and too many adjectives.

[(Anonymous)]

This is exactly how I feel about people who try to write Jane Austen sequels in the same style. Not that very many people try, which is both disappointing and... well, probably just as well.