[ SECRET POST #4544 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4544 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #651.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

And on top of that, it's not like his sexism never affected his work either. He's responsible for some great female characters, but at the same time, he could kind of suck. Remember his Wonder Woman script?

Artistically, I think of Whedon as similar to Shyamalan: It was fresh at first but then you start to notice the formula. For Whedon, it so happens that part of the formula is writing women with straight man goggles.

[philstar22]

I don't know. His formula mostly works for me when it is his own creations. I still really love Buffy, and I like his other tv shows too. It is when he tries to force his formula onto characters that aren't his (Marvel) that it stops working.

[(Anonymous)]

I actually really liked his writing on Astonishing X-Men, which made his handling of the Avengers films even more strange.

I still cringe at the Loki/Natasha and Natasha/Bruce interactions.

Maybe he just can't write Nat.

[(Anonymous)]

he can write her better than the russos can

[(Anonymous)]

I genuinely thought that Wonder Woman was tampered with or a joke. But no.

[(Anonymous)]

Wonder Woman script. I guess I got too busy remembering the weird shit and forgot to include the relevant word.