[ SECRET POST #4555 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4555 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #652.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. https://abload.de/img/img_1846szkhl.jpg

[(Anonymous)]

lol

[(Anonymous)]

turn left website nooooo

[(Anonymous)]

LOL, someone sure is determined to stir the shit today...

Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Killing 35-50 SS guards who had days earlier had forced 7,000 inmates on a death march that resulted in the death of many from exposure and shooting. Yeah, that seems totally equivalent, there. Or, you know, it really, really doesn't.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

I doubt if OP truly thinks it's a good analogy. They're probably just trying to start wank.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

They also killed the Nazis' dogs, who were innocent.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Doesn't Dany murder... like... a whole shitload of innocent civilians

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

The OP was acting like there weren't any innocents killed in the reprisal.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Dogs do not have the same moral standing as human beings

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, they're more innocent.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

"Innocence" and "guilt" don't apply to dogs

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, because they're incapable of being evil like humans are.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

So?

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

So hurting them is worse.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Dogs =/= civilians

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Dogs > civilians

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

DOGS!! >> CIVILIANS!

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

Bollocks. I always side eye people who say this kind of thing. Very often they are assholes towards people, and justify it by "the more I love my cat" slogans.

Re: Oh yeah, that analogy is going to hold up.

[(Anonymous)]

do you know a lot of mean cat owners?

[(Anonymous)]

Is this some kind of reverse Godwin?

[(Anonymous)]

Cersei woke the dragon.

[(Anonymous)]

Now that's what I call (obvious) bait!

[(Anonymous)]

Drink an entire bucket of diarrhea.

WTAF?

[(Anonymous)]

This is both extraordinarily offensive and desperately reaching. Either way you fail big-time.
Show didn't end the way you wanted. Honestly, it happens (happened to me more than once, will happen again).
Deal. With. It.