Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-07-07 03:23 pm
[ SECRET POST #4566 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4566 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #654.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-07 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)Per the book, angels (and deamons?) are sexless unless they make an effort, and per Gaiman, Aziraphale and Crowley are not gay in the sense that they are not male humans, but they do love each other. So, sexual orientation doesn't really apply and who is to say what an explicit romance would even look like between these characters. In that light, I would agree that it's not great representation since it's not about what humans experience.
That said, they are two beings who - Word of God - love each other, who definitely appear to be in love with each other, and who have the appearance of male humans and are played by male human actors, and if people see that and like it or find it empowering, then that's cool and I'm not going to rain on their parade because the romance isn't explicit by some measure. Good Omens is a far cry from most of the "It's totally canon" claims about shows where it totally isn't canon.
It's also possible people are responding to the way the show plays with gender presentation among angels, demons, and the Horsemen, as far as LGBT representation goes.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-07 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-07 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)like jfc how is anyone taking these baity white men as rep- oh, that's why...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-08 01:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-08 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-08 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-08 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)this is just another one of those and no matter how much you scream that it isn't wont make that true.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-09 03:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-08 01:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-07-07 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)If we're judging the two relationships in a similar way as viewers, we can't say one is more canon than the other, but they are both equally implied.
I know that obviously not all viewers are going to go in and actually make that comparison, but it's an interesting one.
no subject
If anything, the sex scene between Anathema and Newton felt gratuitous and out of place tonally to me.