[ SECRET POST #4569 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4569 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #654.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[hey_hey_hey]

The romances in Half-Prince would have played out differently, too. Chest monsters and Hermione attacking Ron with birds would have been out of place with Ron and Ginny's dad being dead. Rowling probably loved both those details.

[(Anonymous)]

You could save him in Prince and kill him in Hallows, if that were the issue

[hey_hey_hey]

But wouldn't both Mr. Weasley and Fred dying a little too much? Would she have wanted Mr. Weasley's death to detract from the tragedy of a twin losing his identical brother?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I would have kept Fred alive. Ultimately Fred's death didn't have much literary impact. Mr. Weasley's death would have been a better choice, IMHO.

[(Anonymous)]

Nothing makes me happier than AUs where Fred lives.