[ SECRET POST #4573 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4573 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #655.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"Even if they've got supporting evidence from whatever was adapted." So what you mean is that what you've meant when you've said it so everyone else must mean the same thing.

My conclusion is sadly more logical than yours, OP. But I'd love to know what you think about the Witcher fandom complaining that Henry Cavill is too young and attractive!

[(Anonymous)]

Henry Cavill IS too young, though.

As for attractive, I would say Geralt is attractive, but he's not the same kind of attractive that Cavill is. Geralt is supposed to be sort of weathered and grim, not chiseled model with a wig and a butt chin.

They're both attractive, yeah, but it's... bad and off.

[(Anonymous)]

OP of the comment behind the secret—I’ve never cared whether an actor is the same age as the character they’re playing; if they can act the part, I’m cool with it. And I don’t really know anything about Witcher except it’s a book series, a video game, or maybe both.