[ SECRET POST #4584 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4584 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #655.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Do you think anyone is 100% heterosexual?

[(Anonymous)]

I think there are people who are extremely unlikely to encounter a scenario in which they would be sexually attracted to someone of their gender. So unlikely that you may as well say they're 100% straight, even if a scenario does exist in which they could theoretically be attracted to someone of their gender.

As others have already said, there's "100% straight" for all practical purposes, and then there's "100% straight" as some kind of universal constant - a state of straightness so absolute that there aren't even any theoretical exceptions to it. I absolutely believe some people are the former kind of straight. I don't know whether anyone is the latter kind of straight, and I don't care.

Re: Do you think anyone is 100% heterosexual?

[(Anonymous)]

I kind of agree.

But I'm one of those nutters who doesn't have an issue with straight-identified MSM/WSW in the same way that I don't have an issue with big fucking tobacco warnings.