[ SECRET POST #4585 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4585 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________












07. [SPOILERS for Good Omens]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #655.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's generally really good and cool and interesting to interpret and analyze and read things, and talk about those readings and various interpretations, and that includes looking and interpreting the sexuality of characters.

[(Anonymous)]

IA, if those interpretations aren't almost completely based on wishful thinking.

OP

[(Anonymous)]

Other people can come to the conclusion that your "interpretation" of hidden messages in costume colors, beer bottles, and mundane conversations among guys who are written and performed as straight is on the same level as ancient astronauts and trained crisis actors. And a piss poor rationale for your shipwars and nagging creative staff.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that the best approach is judging the interpretations on their merits using our best sense. I don't really like the "hidden messages" framework in the first place, and I think that being reasonable and proportional is good and getting into dumb shipwars or being a dick to creators is bad no matter how you interpret the thing.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

+ 10000