[ SECRET POST #4606 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4606 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Kotomi Ichinose, CLANNAD]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________

















05. [SPOILERS for Endgame]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Endgame]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Jessica Jones season 3]
[WARNING for dubcon]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #659.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. https://i.imgur.com/S17NfOa.png

[(Anonymous)]

Rader was also shown in S1 so odds are he knows. There was also probably a process the producers went through when establishing this person as a character and odds are it would have involved speaking to Dennis Rader somewhere along the line. I'm not sure exactly how it works but I think they may have needed his permission to use his name/likeness or risk getting sued.

[(Anonymous)]

That's actually kind of fascinating, I wonder what the law on that is - to what extent serial killers have an expectation of and right to privacy, likeness rights, etc

[(Anonymous)]

Public figures have pretty much no rights to privacy as regards their likeness and portrayal in the US. If you, a public figure of any kind, have someone make a movie about you that is untrue, you can sue for defamation because it harms your reputation. Obviously that's pretty difficult to prove if you're a serial killer.

[kaijinscendre]

I highly doubt they would need his permission. You don't need it for other famous people. And I don't think he could sue.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, there's no lack of coverage and infamy surrounding BTK, e even if the series inexplicably left him out of this. And you could say this about every serial killer mentioned in the show.

[(Anonymous)]

I get what you're saying, but I can understand why he would be important in the development of behavioral analysis. His victimology is not consistent and his methods are not consistent. But he sent messages, so there is clear evidence that a specific person was connected to killings, even if they had no idea who he was.

But then there were quite a few serial killers active in the late 70s and early 80s and many of them are dead now.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm quite a few episodes into S2 now, and I wouldn't have called him the "mastermind killer that always gets away from them". They haven't even really investigated him much, and he's shown as being pathetic and unoriginal quite a few times. Obviously I haven't seen where they're ultimately going with him, but there's nothing terribly impressive about him atm.

[kaijinscendre]

That makes sense because he was pathetic and unoriginal.

[(Anonymous)]

Spoilers:


He's been highlighted at the beginning of every ep of the show...as anon above said, they've only JUST started looking into him in this season. Not sure how that works out to "mastermind killer that always gets away from them".... You can't catch what you're not looking for.

I'm not sure how close their fictional timeline is to RL, but given that Rader wasn't arrested until 2005 (and after having gone cold case by 04) and the show is set in the late 70s/early 80s (Atlanta Child murders case wrapped in 81)? They won't be catching him anytime soon. This secret makes no sense at all.