case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-08-16 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #4606 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4606 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Kotomi Ichinose, CLANNAD]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________

















05. [SPOILERS for Endgame]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Endgame]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Jessica Jones season 3]
[WARNING for dubcon]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #659.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-17 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
What I find problematic is looking at a transparently manipulative plot device in a profoundly stupid science fiction movie (one that makes some MST3K movies look good in comparison) written by marketing-propaganda wonks as a serious ethical problem. It's kind of like judging your friends based on their theory of the physics of Vibranium/Unobtanium.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-17 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)
+1