[ SECRET POST #4609 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4609 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #660.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Having gay characters in movies is not "pushing" homosexuality

[(Anonymous)]

Didn't you know that straight white cis men are the default state of being, and everything else is the 'other' which are only allowed to be utilized when the main stereotypes of their existence have some relevance to the film?

[(Anonymous)]

DA
I think what they were trying to say is that certain countries just don't want to see it no matter what. Just having it represented is enough to ban them, so most movies wont risk losing market by having main characters be homosexual.

[(Anonymous)]

Then the companies making that choice can fuck off.

[(Anonymous)]

It's almost as if movie companies are focused on making money!

[(Anonymous)]

It's not surprising that media companies would act like that, but it is frustrating, especially when those companies also pass themselves off as paragons of representation.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I completely agree! Unfortunately the way the world is right now, I doubt we're going to see it so soon.