[ SECRET POST #4610 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4610 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #660.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sony and Disney are fighting over Spider-Man rights.

[philstar22]

You mean the movie they made? Why should Sony get the money for a Disney movie? That makes no sense. 50-50 seems totally reasonable.

Re: Sony and Disney are fighting over Spider-Man rights.

[(Anonymous)]

It was a coproduction

Re: Sony and Disney are fighting over Spider-Man rights.

[philstar22]

That still makes 50-50 reasonable. 5% only for Disney doesn't seem like a reasonable deal, and it seems perfectly reasonable for Disney to want to renegotiate. I'm all for blaming corporations, and Disney is often the bad guy. But I think people are too quick to blame them sometimes, and I don't see how they are in the wrong for wanting a more fair deal.

Re: Sony and Disney are fighting over Spider-Man rights.

[(Anonymous)]

Sony are the ones who actually, factually own the rights. Spiderman, in film, is Sony's character.

So the question is, how much of the success of the movie can be attributed to Disney? And obviously it's *extremely* difficult to figure out how much each side contributes - either creatively, or in terms of financial ROI - to the movies. But I have a hard time believing that Disney is responsible for 50% of it as compared to a non-Disney version of the film, especially when you compare the success that Sony was able to have with Venom and Spiderverse, neither of which Disney had any input on. So that's why 50% feels unreasonable to me.