case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-08-22 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #4612 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4612 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #660.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-22 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It is true that Star Trek is post-scarcity but I do think that it is a stupid take to say that post-scarcity stories are inherently uninteresting

(Anonymous) 2019-08-23 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
DA. Not that it makes the show uninteresting, but that it takes the easy way out with it's history. Many problems in our world are due to inequalities, particularly in resources. Replicators are not a realitic or feasible strategy for remedying these issues. It's like waving a magic wand to fix your problems. It does the show a disservice to depict a utopia that can only be obtained through a magic device that make almost anything, rather than showing it obtained realistically through hard work and proper strategy.