[ SECRET POST #4612 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4612 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #660.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I know that many people don't have the same issues with CGI that I do (visuals from Polar Express and Avatar range from making me cringe to making my skin crawl), but when I look at the pictures on the left, I physically draw back from them. To me, they look so wrong it is upsetting and uncomfortable. The pictures on the right just seem like elaborate Halloween costumes or enthusiastic cosplayers.

[tabaqui]

That's too bad. Some CGI stuff is really amazing. Some is really obvious. None of it is upsetting to me just as CGI.

I think the only thing that ever got to me, CGI-wise was that recent movie with the robot girl? Because they used a person and just made her have really weird, big eyes. That was bizarre. But mostly it's just...a movie, yay!

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

The Alita: Battle Angel one? I saw the trailers and thought it was a joke, at first.

[tabaqui]

Yeah, that one. Just...wth. That was poorly thought out.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT: "CGI" is pretty much meaningless because nearly everyone is taking advantage of digital workflows these days. So like, the Cats are done with CGI, but so are in-car shots (nearly impossible to mic) and simulated TV footage (easier to apply the right filters than to mess with vintage electronics.)

[tabaqui]

Some are, some aren't. I like that Supernatural doesn't do CGI car stuff, and actually made a little machine thing with lights that spin to simulate cars going by in night shots.

I like that CGI is being used instead of, say, animals in a lot of stuff, and it certainly makes some things cheaper and easier for stuff like alien planets and 'Paris, 1934' or whatever. I don't mind it, though it seems to be a huge bugaboo for some (even when it's not 'uncanny valley' stuff).