case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-08-22 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #4612 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4612 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #660.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: I can see it.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-23 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
SA: That vagueness is what allows for Heinleinites to write themselves into Star Trek history as the clever guys who invent fully automated luxury gay space communism. I don't find that entirely convincing, since I think we're careening into one of the failure modes predicted by Adam Smith. But it's not incompatible with the text.

And then there are the people (including many Puppies) who just want the traditional adventure stories in space and treat the economics as the same sort of treknobabble as the show's physics or biology.