[ SECRET POST #4614 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4614 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #661.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This sort of assumes that antis are a monolith.

And not just antis, but anyone that someone somewhere has called an anti, because that's really what we're talking about here.

[feotakahari]

I’m really not liking the whole reversal of “antis call anyone they don’t like a pedo” into “anti-antis call anyone they don’t like an anti.” Aside from how I don’t see “anti” used that much against anyone who isn’t harassing folks*, it reminds me of the argument that calling someone a “cracker” is just as bad as calling them the N-word.

*Vampireapologist got called an anti without harassing anyone, but if I recall correctly, they actually accepted the term.

[(Anonymous)]

it reminds me of the argument that calling someone a “cracker” is just as bad as calling them the N-word.

No one said anything about being "just as bad".

The term is used in a very imprecise way, which to me makes it much more difficult to assert that antis are monolithic, and I think that's a problem if your argument is that antis are fellow travelers for TERFs and far-right Christians. Especially in the context of a secret that already has a very wide definition of what an anti is.

[(Anonymous)]

are you implying that TERFs and far-right christians are monolithic, because uhhhhhhh

[(Anonymous)]

They're not monolithic, but the differences among them aren't really relevant in this context. What's relevant about them in this context is their political beliefs and the motivation for their actions - the fact that they are all far-right or TERFs (respectively). With the understanding that people on F!S are implicitly opposed to those ideologies.