[ SECRET POST #4655 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4655 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Chicago Med]

[Conner/Ava]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #666.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Recalling public knowledge that someone's discussed many times in the forum isn't "harbouring details". I was just trying to frame it in a context that's closer to home. And it worked.

[(Anonymous)]

And yet your superior observational skills failed to notice they have also been ill for the last day or so, this is their opinion, and that this is, in fact, not their place of work. People do have lives outside their occupation.
You can try to frame it any way you like, the only person you've convinced is yourself.

I don't have a problem with you making your argument, but don't bring someone's personal matters into it just because you have a name to go with an account.

[(Anonymous)]

they were just putting their argument in a context they thought would be more understandable for who they're talking to, i don't understand the big deal. if i was arguing with someone and they started bringing up concepts from my line of work to illustrate their point i'd be delighted, your outrage is certainly not universal.

[(Anonymous)]

You've accomplished nothing other than some points scoring about something that is essentially irrelevant.

Philstar is trying to give voice to something that is not easily defined, the motives of the OP, something that is recognized by myself and at least one other person.

Let's look at your motives. Instead of asking for clarification in a forum that is based on discussion, you instead treat this like a trial. Why is it that you fail to recognize the difference between a courtroom and an open forum for discussion? You have some baggage there yourself.

And, please, capitalize. You are coming off as amateurish.

[(Anonymous)]

i'm not the anon you were arguing with which i thought was obvious with how i referred to them as "they"
als amateurish this is a fandom community who here is a professional fandom secrets user lmao jesus

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt
It's the way that they use that information as a 'one up' to their argument. They are not asking her opinion as a professional lawyer, nor are they interested in actual citations from the secret itself. It's done mockingly because they believe she misinterpreted the secret, not in good fun, nor in good taste. Otherwise they would not have said, "and it worked", as if there was actually something to be won by using her job against her.
Named users do get a lot of backlash I find on this comm otherwise I wouldn't have said anything, I know Philistar can handle herself. There seems to be a few anons on here who only to exist to antagonize them. It's why a lot of them left, or went anon themselves.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

[(Anonymous)]

you know people in this comm really seem to enjoy picking the worst interpretation of things be it secrets or comments and it's very exhausting

neither me nor philistar read it like that, maybe it's not as cut and dried as you think?

[(Anonymous)]

I'll keep out of it next time.