case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-10-04 06:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #4655 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4655 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Chicago Med]

[Conner/Ava]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #666.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-10-05 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
my point is they wouldn't actually do it otherwise. if they were willing to do it, they would just do it. so we can conclude that they're not willing to actually do it.

so it's unlikely that the particular scenes that you're objective to - as annoying as the way they're used for PR stuff is - actually have the effect of stopping Marvel or Disney or whoever from including better LGBTQ representation in their blockbusters. in the same way that the racial-swapped reboots OP was talking about originally probably don't take away from original content.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2019-10-05 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
And *my* point is, they are willing to do it only to get brownie points and some publicity, but not to actually put in the work and do it *right*.

I think it does, though, since - once again - they have checked that square, they can pat themselves on the back and say they did it and go merrily on not really doing jack shite.