[ SECRET POST #4657 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4657 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #667.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The severity of the rulebreaking should absolutely have an impact on it. What matters is how wrong it is, how right it is, how harmful it is, how helpful it is. Rules are a structure that may or may not be of use.

[(Anonymous)]

+100000

[(Anonymous)]

Lawful Neutral vs. Neutral Good

[(Anonymous)]

I can't agree. If the rule is a bad rule (in the same way as if a law is a bad law) then work on changing or removing that rule/law. It's not cart blanche to break the rule/law because you personally do not agree with it?

[(Anonymous)]

I think there are some rules that aren't really morally good or bad. So, like in this case - adding a donation link to your page isn't morally bad. It just can't be allowed on AO3 for legal reasons. The rule still has to be enforced enforcement, because enforcing the rule serves the greater good of allowing AO3 to continue to exist. But the rule is only a means towards that end, it's not good in and of itself (it's a hypothetical imperative). So it's not really morally necessary for some random AO3 user to help enforce it.

Especially if they don't actually care about the morality of it, and are just annoyed at people asking for donations.