[ SECRET POST #4680 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4680 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Superstore]


__________________________________________________



03.
[12 Angry Men (1957/1997)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Deacon's erotic dance from "What We Do in the Shadows"]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Mystery Science Theater 3000]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel]


__________________________________________________



07.
[All Rise]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #670.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ninefox]

But OP either thinks there's a real chance or they don't. If there is, then cool. And if not....they're used to slash ships, they shouldn't think it's terrible and secret-worthy to be shipping (gasp!) already married people the creators don't endorse!

I feel like I'm watching a mime build an invisible box around themselves. "Oh no, the ship won't work for x and y and z....how can I possibly...." But like. There's no box. Because it's fandom. And I'd expect a slash fan to have internalized that.

"Of course I want my ships to be canon" - no, not of course. I don't....care that much. Canon almost always fucks things up. I never care that much about what's canon. Either the writer is good enough that I trust them to sell me on whatever they're going for, or they're going to do something I disagree with in which case I get to grab their toys and run. And I feel like pre-Twoof (or maybe pre-SPN??? it got weird) slash fandom largely agreed on that.

Like, I know people like you exist. But I wouldn't expect someone who "didn't usually ship het" to invest any emotional energy into caring about canon on that level.

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

I can't think of any het pair I think I'd "ship" but as someone who ships a lot of gay pairs, I tend to avoid getting invested in shows where relationships play a huge part (like a teenage show with a lot of dating for example) or shows with established canon couples as protagonists.

So I guess the invisible line here makes perfect sense to me. Shipping a pair of unattached male friends who you know canon will never make a real couple within the show could be seen as a logical extension of canon-- ie, Bob and Joe may be friends now but only because they haven't realized their feelings for each other yet. There's nothing inherent in the canon that contradicts that per se. But if Bob and Joe are both married to women, that adds a layer of canon contradiction that my brain doesn't accept, unless at some point they both get divorced in canon. Infidelity is a major squick of mine, but apart from that, the fact that their relationship directly -contradicts- canon is much different from -building on- canon.

[ninefox]

Huhn.

That makes sense, I can see it! But I don't think I'd ever be able to really draw that line myself for most media, at least if it was ongoing at all. Because 95% of everything american TV, even if it's supposed to be about murder mysteries or space aliens or whatever, ends up dabbling in relationship bullshit and sudden love interests at some point. I just sort of expect the looming specter of compulsory heterosexuality to come crashing into any genre at any time, lol. At which point I'm ready to fend it off with extreme prejudice.