Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-10-30 06:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #4681 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4681 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #670.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-10-31 02:59 am (UTC)(link)Like, I’m not entertained by ostensibly historical movies that don’t either make a conscious choice to go “anachronisms for everyone, fuck yeah this is fun!” or alternatively to at least make an effort to not have, idk, a doctor in 14th century Prague warning everyone about the dangers of bacterial cross-contamination.
If there’s gonna be blatantly wrong shit happening in a historical movie, I want it to be because it’ll make a comedy funnier, or draw a more obvious parallel with an equivalent modern situation, or for some other considered reason that’s not “people don’t care about facts or history, only sex and explosions and witty one liners, so we as screenwriters/directors don’t give a shit either.”
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-10-31 11:33 am (UTC)(link)mind you i share your taste, but for example the popularity of police procedurals tells me a lot of ppl don't give a fuuuuuuuuck about any degree of accuracy and so producing things that way is valid.