case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-11 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #4693 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4693 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #672.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Secrets you WANT to be made

(Anonymous) 2019-11-12 08:56 am (UTC)(link)
It may not be a "flame" per se, but when you do that you're still being a douche. They didn't ask for constructive criticism. They didn't ask how you feel about their negative opinion on [character x]. They obviously know their opinion is negative. It's not like they're just doing it by accident and are going to change their ways once you alert them to it.

If you're very friendly about it, I can see the comment about misleading tags being appropriate. If you phrase it as, like, "I'm sincerely not trying to start wank, but I found the tags kind of misleading for reasons and was wondering if you'd consider changing the way this is tagged?"

But if you come in and phrase it how you're actually feeling ("Wow dude, those tags are super misleading. I really wish I'd known where this was going when I started reading and saved myself the unpleasant surprise and the wasted time.") you have to know you're looking for a fight.