case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-13 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #4695 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4695 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #672.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-14 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes I think I'm okay with the concept of RPF, and then people talk about "canon" in REAL PEOPLE'S lives and back it up with the existence of trash tabloids and it makes something inside me shrivel up. It's just wrong.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-14 07:46 am (UTC)(link)
and then people talk about "canon" in REAL PEOPLE'S lives

I mean, RPFers need a way of talking about established events. I don't think calling "things we know happened because they happened publicly or were explicitly mentioned by the individuals involved" canon is that unreasonable. If an RPFer starts saying stuff is "canon" when it's actually just speculation then yeah, that's definitely squicky, but it makes sense that in fandom, where the word 'canon' is already in heavy use, it would be used by RPFers as well.