case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-16 05:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4698 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4698 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #673.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-17 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
every adaptation involves changing some things, just by the nature of moving to a different medium.

This is true, but a lot of adaptations don't even try.

if the adaptation is just a reflection of the glory of the original, what's the point of the adaptation at all?

Seeing the original in a different medium, for one. Definitely a big part of the appeal for some people. Or if it's a same-medium adaptation, then seeing the original looking shiny and seamless and non-dated. I mean, a friend of mine recently showed me that famous fan-made reshoot of the fight between Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader, and it was glorious. It changed very little about what actually happens in the scene, and yet the whole thing felt magnificently revamped and revitalized.

*shrugs*

I honestly like extremely loose adaptations for a lot of things. But I also understand why people who hate loose adaptations feel the way they do, and I think both sides' perspectives are valid.