Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-11-16 05:30 pm
[ SECRET POST #4698 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4698 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #673.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-11-17 12:21 am (UTC)(link)This is true, but a lot of adaptations don't even try.
if the adaptation is just a reflection of the glory of the original, what's the point of the adaptation at all?
Seeing the original in a different medium, for one. Definitely a big part of the appeal for some people. Or if it's a same-medium adaptation, then seeing the original looking shiny and seamless and non-dated. I mean, a friend of mine recently showed me that famous fan-made reshoot of the fight between Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader, and it was glorious. It changed very little about what actually happens in the scene, and yet the whole thing felt magnificently revamped and revitalized.
*shrugs*
I honestly like extremely loose adaptations for a lot of things. But I also understand why people who hate loose adaptations feel the way they do, and I think both sides' perspectives are valid.