case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-16 05:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4698 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4698 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #673.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Hmm.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-17 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I sort of get that, but I feel like you are not including a few things.

If an adaptation has very little in common with the source material, that is really annoying because the only reason they haven't called it something else is to get the money/attention of the already built-in fanbase.

If an adaptation seems contemptuous of a good portion of the source elements, that is very annoying.

If an adaptation does not really get the point of the source material or why people like, well, I can understand that to a point, different interpretations and all, but it's still kind of irritating. Like, I feel like a bunch of video game movies have been made by people who never played the games.