case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-19 07:19 pm

[ SECRET POST #4701 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4701 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #673.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-20 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
OP didn't say they didn't like it.

And they didn't say there was an inherent disconnect.

DA

(Anonymous) 2019-11-20 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
With the second part of their secret, it seems that it's what they were saying.

About the secret itself : I partially disagree. A good worldbuilding can have litterary quality and enhance the overall quality of a story by making it more immersive. However, a worldbuilding that's more concerned about the quantity of informations/the technicalies and not about, for instance, the beauty of the descriptions, has the opposite effect. Or the worldbuilding can be neutral and the litterary quality can then depend mostly on the characters and the narrative.

So the wordlbuilding does factor into the litterary quality but a very in depth worldbuilding is not always a worldbuilding that adds to the litterary quality of a piece of fiction.