case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-23 04:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #4705 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4705 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #674.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-23 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
OP - Actually, I think it's more a matter of whether we're talking about the specific thing that is Vidding Fandom (I.e. the specific group of vidders who make vividcon happen and who tend to vid in a fairly specific way, with a kind of recognizable style, ethos, and artistry), or if we're just talking about vidding fandom in lowercase (I.e. people who make fanvids).

There have always been people who's vids are half dialogue and zero commentary. But when it comes to Vidding Fandom specifically, I'd go as far as to say there's almost an unspoken rule that if your vid relies on a bunch of dialogue to make it a whole vid, you're not doing the same kind of vidding anymore.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-23 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're trying to tell me. Is your secret about Vidding Fandom changing its credo?

(Anonymous) 2019-11-23 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Its about Vidding Fandom becoming more and more subsumed and aged out, and that being IMO, a loss.

(Anonymous) 2019-11-23 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Ooooh, gotcha.