Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-12-11 06:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #4723 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4723 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #676.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-12-12 03:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-12-12 03:15 am (UTC)(link)This is a mess... Fair warning;;
(Anonymous) 2019-12-12 03:40 am (UTC)(link)(I know nothing about these characters, I'm sorry! I'm trying to distract myself from my looming responsibilities, and my sleeping pill seems to think I have much to say about this...)
If Ace got himself killed by doing something stupid then that would be Ace's fault, no doubt about it, but given the fact I have no idea what I'm talking about, is it fair to assume that Garp could have kept him wholly safe as prisoner? Or that Ace wouldn't risk death himself to try and escape the Marines, or the dungeons? If being free to make his own decisions is structural to Ace, I imagine keeping him against his will wouldn't be very easy.
Garp perhaps let him go because he knew Ace wouldn't respond well to being chained down against his will. From that perspective Garp took a chance of allowing Ace his freedom, because he knew his death might be assured if he hadn't?
With that series of unfortunate takes, I will agree with you. If there was any risk both by other threats, or Ace himself, and Garb let Ace go as the best means for him to survive, than Garb has no responsibility in Ace's death.